Wundef.com
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Tech
  • Personal Development
  • Wundef TV
  • Get Inspired
  • Time Management
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • General
    • Opportunities
    • Health
    • Opinion
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Game Changers
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Marketing
  • Personal Finance
  • Work Ethics
  • Profiles
  • News
    • General
    • Opportunities
    • Health
    • Opinion
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Game Changers
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Marketing
  • Personal Finance
  • Work Ethics
  • Profiles
No Result
View All Result
Wundef.com
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT

The dark side of transparency

by Julian Birkinshaw and Dan Cable
4 years ago
in Leadership
9 min read
0 0
The dark side of transparency
83
SHARES
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsapp

READ ALSO

5 Places to Invest in 2021

5 Steps to Move From Employee to Entrepreneur

The Importance of Self-Awareness

The Proclamation of Innovation – Redefine Your Industry

Introduction to Self-Leadership

Executives need to get smarter about when to open up and when to withhold information so they can enjoy the benefits of organizational transparency while mitigating its unintended consequences.

Transparency in the business world—think of buyers and sellers rating each other on eBay, Airbnb, and Uber—is generally considered a good thing. It accelerates information gathering, helps people coordinate their efforts, and makes those in positions of authority accountable to others.

What about transparency within organizations? Again, many emphasize the benefits of sharing information freely, as a way of empowering frontline employees and improving the quality and speed of decision making. For example, transparency is one of the key principles in the increasingly popular Scrum methodology for project management: “In my companies, every salary, every financial, every expenditure is available to everyone,” says Jeff Sutherland, its inventor. Compared to knowledge hoarding and secretive behavior, it is easy to agree that greater information sharing is a good thing.

ADVERTISEMENT

But there is also a “dark side” to transparency. Excessive sharing of information creates problems of information overload and can legitimize endless debate and second-guessing of senior executive decisions. High levels of visibility can reduce creativity as people fear the watchful eye of their superiors. And the open sharing of information on individual performance and pay levels, often invoked as a way of promoting trust and collective responsibility, can backfire.

There is a fascinating paradox in all this. It’s possible in a digital age to track activities in real time and to share information widely at almost zero cost (in theory, at least, improving decision making). But, in many cases, the innovations that have brought this about have reduced effectiveness, thanks to an emerging “accountability gap” where information is in the hands of people who may not use it wisely.

Executives may therefore need to become smarter about when to open up and when to withhold information. This article looks at three main areas where too much transparency creates problems and offers some guidance on how to get the balance right.

Transparency in day-to-day business activities

Thanks to technology, companies can now monitor business activities in minute detail, from verbatim logs in a call center to real-time GPS tracking of component supplies. Such information isn’t necessarily restricted to top executives: some firms now make video recordings of their meetings so everyone can see what went on; others have opened up their strategy-making process by allowing employees across the firm to read and review a wide range of planning documents.

The argument for transparency lies in the wisdom-of-crowds effect: by broadening the number of people involved, we will make smarter decisions and we will increase buy-in. But there are also problems with this approach. One is lack of speed: “It takes us so much longer to make decisions because so many people are involved,” admits Jim Whitehurst, CEO of software company Red Hat, which has pioneered a highly inclusive approach to strategy making.

The other, and bigger, concern is that people weigh in without relevant knowledge, or without any responsibility to see things through. One university we know well provided faculty with detailed information about the student demand for elective courses, resulting in a number of proposals to cut certain courses and grow others. The proposals were well intentioned, but were later rejected because the faculty did not know the trade-offs that had to be managed to introduce new classes. Both faculty and senior management were frustrated.

Some companies have sought to overcome this accountability gap. For example, the Amazon subsidiary Zappos recently experimented with an ambitious form of self-management called holacracy, in which work is done in self-governing teams without any formal management roles, and employees have a “duty of transparency.”1But implementing this new transparent way of working has not worked for everyone, with 14 percent of workers choosing to leave since it was introduced. One study noted that it “has been confusing and time-consuming, especially at first, sometimes requiring five extra hours of meetings a week as workers unshackled from their former bosses organize themselves into ‘circles.’” Another company, Shift (founded by former Zappos manager Zach Ware), abandoned holacracy after less than a year because it led to too many meetings and vague decision-making authority.

Such cases reveal an important truth: many people do not want to know the full details of how their firm is doing, nor do they want to be held fully responsible for its outputs. Instead, they want to know enough to do their job well and they want to have the right to know more, but for the most part they are happy for someone else to process and manage that information on their behalf.

So how do you get the balance right? The first rule of thumb is to strive for a match between transparency and responsibility. If client service is everyone’s responsibility, then data on service levels should be available to all; but if decisions about which product lines to invest in and which ones to cut are the CEO’s responsibility, he or she should have privileged access to the information needed to make those decisions. If employees can access this type of privileged information anyway, it is useful to create a team or task force with responsibility for sifting through and channeling the views of employees to the ultimate decision makers. A works council in Germany or an employee committee like the one at retailer John Lewis can give employees a voice without the entire decision-making process grinding to a halt.

Transparency in employee efforts and rewards

Employee earnings is a second and highly controversial dimension of transparency. About one-third of US companies have “no disclosure” contracts that specifically forbid employees from discussing their pay with coworkers.3In most others, pay is implicitly a private matter between boss and employee. But in recent years a number of firms have experimented with radical pay transparency, even in large firms such as Whole Foods Market. Reasons for this shift include a desire to treat employees as adults, increase trust, and spur competition.

But sharing pay information can backfire—badly. Consider the example of a Canadian engineering firm. Each year, just before Christmas, the founder and CEO of the 30-year-old company used to look over each employee’s contributions for the year, and then award each person a bonus based on his personal beliefs about the value of those contributions. Sometimes the bonuses would be large—say $30,000—and other times the bonuses would be small ($5,000 or nothing at all). There was no formula, only the judgment call of the founder.

As the organization grew, however, the CEO requested that company leaders develop a rational and transparent process for determining allocation of bonuses. The leaders worked for a year to create a fair bonus system based on pre-established key performance indicators, and launched it through town halls and workshops so that everyone was clear how their bonus would be calculated. A year later, after the bonuses had been calculated and distributed according to the new system, employees acknowledged the increased transparency, but their perceptions of the fairness of the bonuses were significantly worse, and they trusted the employer less (exhibit). Even those who had received as much or more than the previous year were significantly less satisfied with the fairness of the more transparent system, and trusted the employer less.

Exhibit
One company’s new transparent bonus plan paradoxically reduced its employees’ perceptions of trust and fairness.

What went wrong? Interviews we conducted with employees suggested two unintended side effects of the new process. First, transparency invited a critical and transactional evaluation, rather than the bonus being seen as an unexpected gift. Second, transparency highlighted those who received larger bonuses, inviting envy on the part of those who fared less well.

The company leaders were genuinely surprised and have had to train managers to have tough monthly conversations, which can be facilitated through better data and clearer expectations about performance criteria.

This case illustrates the psychological phenomenon of social comparison, whereby people have a need to compare themselves to others. In the workplace, we are driven to compare the equity of our contributions (inputs) and rewards (outcomes) relative to others. Perceiving our ratio of rewards to contributions as worse than other people’s creates mental dissonance that can spiral into envy, distraction, stealing, withdrawing effort, or quitting.

Greater transparency was supposed to increase perceptions of equity at the Canadian engineering firm, but its emphasis on outcomes (rather than inputs and outcomes) had the opposite effect. Employees focused on “gaming” the mechanics of the system rather than creating real value and thinking about the collective good. As a result, the senior executives had to put in a lot of additional work, meeting with employees to explain more clearly how the new scheme actually worked. In hindsight, one of them noted, “it would have been useful to announce and run the new bonus system as a ‘phantom’ for the first year, telling employees what they would have earned under the new system, and then allowing them voice about the pain points of the new system.”

In sum, even though many firms are experimenting with pay transparency, we believe they should be cautious and only do it when they can clearly connect employees’ inputs to the outcomes they achieved.

Transparency in creative work

The third area where transparency can backfire is in creative work.

In many circumstances, such as working on an oil rig where safety comes first, making actions visible to others is a good thing. But in other circumstances it can have its downsides. Creative work, in particular, with its nonlinear detours and dead ends, does not benefit from high levels of transparency. Indeed, the close monitoring of the process of developing a creative product is detrimental because the creative person may self-censor some of his or her better ideas, for fear that they will be misunderstood or criticized. For example, one study found that workers in a mobile-phone factory actually did their most productive and creative work when they were not being observed, suggesting that performance improvements can sometimes be achieved by creating “zones of privacy.”

Consider the case of Eulogy, a communications agency based in London, where CEO Adrian Brady has sought to increase transparency in his team’s creative work by bringing clients into early-stage brainstorming sessions. While this approach has ultimately proven useful, Euology’s experience also shows it can give rise to negative side effects.

One problem is that clients can reject early-stage ideas before there is a chance to develop them fully. “A client’s immediate negative reaction to a potentially great idea can end a conversation before it takes flight, making it hard to do anything big or new,” explained Brady.

Another issue with full transparency is that clients don’t fully understand the process they are observing. “Sometimes a winning creative idea that is perfectly suited for a client’s brief is something that pops into our heads within minutes,” said Brady, whereas in other cases it can take many weeks. When clients have a “time-and-materials mind-set” they’re likely to focus on how long it took to get the idea, rather than how much value it will generate.

Eulogy’s original and highly successful campaign for the beer company Grolsch, for example, was based on a single brainstorming session. “Logically, clients know they pay us for our expertise, experience, and creativity in the right idea,” Brady observed. “But emotionally, it can be hard for people to pay us if they know it took 15 minutes to generate.”

A similar sort of challenge faces companies that make video recordings of meetings and then post them online for all employees to review. One company tested this new approach for a year, but with mixed results. While seen as a big step forward in accountability, some executives were seen to talk freely in ways that reflected negatively on, and offended, employees. Executives subsequently became more cautious in their meetings, self-censoring their comments, and taking all the important conversations offline.

To overcome these issues executives should identify the truly creative activities in their firm. Which elements of work proceed on a “one step back, two steps forward” basis, and which take place according to a predictable linear sequence of steps? They can then build “windows” into the process through which individuals not involved (either outsiders or interested employees from other parts of the organization) can review progress and take stock. Typically those individuals will be happy if they know in advance where the windows are.

The stronger the level of trust between those doing the creative work and those overseeing it, the larger the windows can become.


We are getting used to transparency in our lives. We allow companies to know where we are physically and what we are thinking about and searching for. There are some 1.18 billion active users on Facebook every day, many of whom are updating their information for all to see. But transparency can also cause pain without much gain. Smart leaders need to know when to share and when to keep things back. They should also know when to get immersed in the details of a project or activity and when to turn a blind eye. Transparency is vital, but it has a dark side, and it takes real skill to get the balance right.

Get Your News on Wundef.com

Send us your business and entrepreneurship stories/news and articles to admin@wundef.com or through whatsapp, +233247516850.

Subscribe to our Youtube Channel, Like our Facebook Page

And also follow us on Twitter

Share83TweetShareSend

Get Updates Right in your Inbox

Unsubscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Essence of Leadership? Seeing Triumph in Tragedy.

Next Post

Why graduates and job seekers must use LinkedIn Effectively.

Related Posts

5 Places to Invest in 2021

5 Steps to Move From Employee to Entrepreneur

5 Steps to Move From Employee to Entrepreneur

The Importance of Self-Awareness

The Proclamation of Innovation – Redefine Your Industry

Introduction to Self-Leadership

Creativity and Future of Business: It’s No Surprise CEOs Rank Creativity As Top Leadership Quality

Organizational Structure, Creativity, Innovation

“Africa For Africans” – Speech Delivered by Marcus Garvey at Madison Square Garden, New York

Brainstorming and Innovation – Not Really Working Anymore

Women in Philanthropy: Five Stories

Next Post

Why graduates and job seekers must use LinkedIn Effectively.

4 Things I Learnt From My High School Mentor About Leadership

4 Things I Learnt From My High School Mentor About Leadership

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to our Newsletter

ADVERTISEMENT

Recent Posts

Everything Samsung Unveiled at their Galaxy Unpacked 2021 (Twi Tech Review)

Everything Samsung Unveiled at their Galaxy Unpacked 2021 (Twi Tech Review)

Top 10 Chinese Tech Billionaires

Top 10 Chinese Tech Billionaires

Samsung Releases the Galaxy S21 Series

Samsung Releases the Galaxy S21 Series

Huawei’s Under-Screen Camera Patent Surfaces Online

Huawei’s Under-Screen Camera Patent Surfaces Online

Raise Your Self-Esteem by Using Affirmations

Raise Your Self-Esteem by Using Affirmations

Danita Johnson Makes History as the 1st Black President of a Major League Soccer Team

Danita Johnson Makes History as the 1st Black President of a Major League Soccer Team

Meet the Owner of the Newest Black-Owned Used Car Dealership in Charlotte

Meet the Owner of the Newest Black-Owned Used Car Dealership in Charlotte

ADVERTISEMENT

Trending Now

Short Profile of Eric Asubonteng, Managing Director of AngloGold Ashanti, Obuasi Mine

She lost her Dad at 7, Held 4 ministerial Positions among other Top Positions in the country, This is the Story of Dr. Rev. Joyce Aryee

The dark side of transparency

From Kalmoni and Sons to Japan Motors, This is how the Kalmoni Family has Built a Business Empire in Ghana

5 Factors of Production

Profile of Apostle Dr. Kwadwo Safo Kantanka, The Star of Africa

7 Online Streams Of Income That Can Earn You Money And Financial Freedom

Samsung Releases the Galaxy S21 Series

15 of The Most Common Interview Questions and Answers

The Wundef Show: CEO of Danywise Estates and Construction shares his story

ADVERTISEMENT

Follow us on Twitter

Editor's Picks

  • All
  • Editor's Picks
Fairafric – The story of a business tapping into Ghana’s US$100bn cocoa sector

Fairafric – The story of a business tapping into Ghana’s US$100bn cocoa sector

Why Entrepreneurs Need to Approach Social Media Like Athletes and Celebrities

Why Entrepreneurs Need to Approach Social Media Like Athletes and Celebrities

Follow the 3 Ps to Grow Your Social Media Influence

Follow the 3 Ps to Grow Your Social Media Influence

The Best Safaris in Africa

The Best Safaris in Africa

Is Your Money Blueprint Making You Richer Or Poorer?

Is Your Money Blueprint Making You Richer Or Poorer?

Struggling will make you stronger

Struggling will make you stronger

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Follow on Facebook

Follow us

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Editor's Picks
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Game Changers
  • General
  • Get Inspired
  • Health
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Marketing
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Opportunities
  • Personal Development
  • Personal Finance
  • Profiles
  • Safety
  • Tech
  • Time Management
  • Work Ethics
  • Wundef TV
ADVERTISEMENT

Instagram

© 2020 | Wundef.com

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • General
    • Opportunities
    • Health
    • Tech
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Leadership
  • Game Changers
  • Work Ethics
  • Get Inspired
  • Marketing
  • Wundef TV
  • Personal Development
  • Personal Finance
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks

© 2020 | Wundef.com

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist